Under normal circumstances, I would have no difficulty believing the Navy, and no difficulty believing the WSJ. Both have earned their credibility. But they can't both be right.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
which one should we believe? hmmm....let me think...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People realize Trump flew by helo from one ship to the other right? How the hell was he going to see any crew of the McCain?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, you have the Navy taking an opposing view from the WSJ, WaPo and admin officials who confirmed the story to the WaPo...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This doesn’t explain the emails that the WSJ quoted...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
gonna take the Navy on this one. WSJ went balls up by 2006.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only answer: full broadsides by the best Navy ship versus the best dingy WSJ can source through their hedge fund holdings
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Previous tweet from this account is 2014. Don't trust it as a source if someone popped up just to address this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are conflating the WSJ with the anti-Trump storyteller who wrote the story for the WSJ.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.