I’ll vouch that he’s “cleaner” than 80% of democrats in Congress.
-
-
-
Replying to @HudsonRiverCroc @TheHootyman
If you concede that it's OK to investigate or prosecute your political enemies, or call for doing so, if they are actually guilty of things, then you have already abandoned the entire talking point about it being improper ever to do so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @TheHootyman
This is a deflection and not what I asked. Can you vouch for him being honest and not breaking any law in the last 5 years?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HudsonRiverCroc @TheHootyman
This is a deflection and not what my original tweet is about. You're ignoring the point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @TheHootyman
So clarify it, are you not presuming he’s being investigated for purely political reasons?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HudsonRiverCroc @TheHootyman
I do not presume that calls for his investigation & prosecution are purely free of political or partisan considerations. Do you?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @TheHootyman
So you admit the calls for investigation are not due to purely, exclusively, political motivations. Good.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HudsonRiverCroc @TheHootyman
You did not answer the question, which I take as a concession. Which means, again, that you don't dispute my point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @TheHootyman
A) I asked a question first you answer the question directly and I will answer yours directly B) You have twice refused to answer my initial question and C) Classical twitter claiming victory while refusing to answer directly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You barged into my thread and have persistently refused to address the topic. That speaks for itself.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.