The Founders did not believe that the Constitution would be changed over time by the courts, rather than the sovereign people through the Article V amendment process.https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1132086340202504198 …
-
-
You’re right re the 13th. And yes, the age of a President or the functions of the branches was clearly articulated and not controversial. I’m more interested in the nuances of the Bill of Rights.
-
There is a fundamental difference between "understand what the rules meant when written and apply them to new situations" and "rewrite the rules over time in lieu of leaving that job to the people's representatives." The Founders anticipated *technological* change.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.