It's interesting to reread the First Amendment as a special disability to be imposed on religious people. Whereas, you can impose your metaphysical beliefs trading under any other brand.
-
-
I think it's unanswerable and that we will have two choices: draw an arbitrary line (the status quo since Roe) or say: No abortions, ever. I think the latter does more harm than good.
-
So the definition is legitimate only if it is arbitrary? Again, we're not discussing what is the *right* definition but whether one definition is legitimate & another is not. You're conceding here the necessity of having a legal definition.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Nazis very well justified their actions on the basis Jews were not fully human. If you asked them they weren't engaging in murder either.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would like to take a moment to talk about gun control <ducks>
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So where do y'all get the idea that the Soul enters the body at conception (or is it Heartbeat, or Quickening, or Viability this week?)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.