This is nonsense. It's not how the Establishment Clause was understood when ratified or how it's been read by SCOTUS. The Constitution in no way prohibits laws from being based on morality, justice, fairness, respect for human life or any other normative premise.https://twitter.com/EasterbrookG/status/1131603369871761408 …
-
-
The problem is, now we have a bunch of twats that think that freedom *of* religion means freedom *from* religion, and that everyone else has to abandon their religion to accommodate these idiots.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but that's a very useful rule, if you've defined your normative premises as resting on "science." somehow i don't think our moral superiors are planning on giving that one up
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yo, philosophy PhD here. The thesis you mention is obviously dumb, but idk if you know what a "category error" is...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess we have to remove laws against murder because the 10 commandments said it first.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.