But it *does* collapse any claim to be better than the Democrats, and it lends legitimacy (imo) to the argument that they now must supplant the Republicans until Trump is gone.
-
-
Omg, dood. Even having a political debate around this idea freaks you / your ilk out. Do you really think court expansion would ever happen? Cmon, straw-boy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Um, yeah, that 22%, plus another 22-33%, are the best parts of the current Court. You don't have to agree to coexist with Donald. You have a choice, listen to Tom, please.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You have no line for Republican and everyone knows it, you should just admit it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dan’s only consistent position is his belief Democrats are evil. Why even bother debating this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Uhhh....isn't Mitch just gonna block every Democratic nomination anyway? You are gonna continue to side with Trumo even though we all watched Garland happen?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s not going to happen; this is like taking to Rain Man about plane crashes.
-
He's like a triangle merry go round.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dan's argument is that it's ok to abandon your values because your party has a "platform" and got court seats. Exactly what's wrong with Washington.
-
Dans “argument” is abortion/gays/abortion/gays/abortion/gays - everything else is sophistry.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We don’t have one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.