I agree that there is a high moral cost to Trump, and doubly so among those people who have foolishly embraced him rather than just agreed to coexist with him. None of that, however, changes the fundamental orientation of each party on policy. None of it excuses the Democrats.https://twitter.com/HeathMayo/status/1125824271337558016 …
-
-
Expertise is no match for deeply held political beliefs fused to confirmation bias. Like many “I have no choice” cons, you’re ignoring the actual destruction of the rule of law underway and rationalizing it with horror stories of what could happen if Dems control all the things.
-
Like maybe we get a “wingman” as AG?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tom. Dan has an actual law degree. Dems are flat-out opposed to 1A, 2A. Maybe sit this one out.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This. The “Dems are destroying the constitutional order” nonsense has been Crank’s go-to hyperbolic claim for years, yet the example of that he “starts with” is something floated last month by the mayor of South Bend.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dems court packing bad, Cons court packing good. Why not all court packing bad?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That's a really stupid comment that actually makes Dan's point, not yours. You're not going to pack the courts, no more than you're going to get some sort of revenge for Garland. But nice that you're dumb enough to play right into the Trump argument.
End of conversation
-
-
-
"Would end the rule of law" Sorry. Trump and his corrupt minions have already done that. You cannot end something that no longer exists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.