Lol dan, it’s funny how you play dumb about the fact that the democrats won’t be able to write new rules with this court
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Brown Vs Board of Education?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dredd Scott and Plessy want her to go into more detail about her sudden love of stare decisis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you really think that’s what’s happening with SCOTUS? No one really believes that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. If people want to change policy, they should elect new leaders to do it, and everyone will accept those results. That's why the constitutionality of the ACA has never been questioned. ...Checks Notes...Nevermind.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Progress from the progressive viewpoint leads to nihilism, despotism and death. I thank God every day that our Constitution was designed to make things grindingly difficult to change.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
which will... then be struck down by the courts.
-
As they shpuld, if the said law violates the Constitution, like if there is a law prevdnting the publication of the Bible, violating the 1st amendment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Like Shelby County and Citizens United oh wait, no. no. In GOP's eyes, the point of courts is to advance conservative interests.
-
I'm familiar with both cases, and that is a mischaracterization. If you want to see real Judicial Legislation, look up the Dredd Scott case, Wickard vs. Fillburn, Roe Vs. Wade, and the Obamacare "tax or fee" dilemma.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.