This, I disagree with. The fact that Trump won is fairly strong proof that any Republican could have won. Of course, Kasich would have had a different coalition & victory was uncertain, but these are the natural dynamics after 8 years of an incumbent.https://twitter.com/fredontwittur/status/1120735814726631426 …
-
-
Would Cruz though? I'm not actually opposed to his policies, but realistically he was as toxic to the general electorate as Trump and without the white-working-class cred to back him up, let's not forget he came close to losing Texas last year due to low turnout.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not true! Those voters didn't vote for Toomey or Johnson. But they still ran ahead of Trump.https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/01/real-reason-trump-won-trend-away-incumbents-strongest-factor/ …
End of conversation
-
-
-
I'm not able to join you here, Dan. I was an early Rubio supporter and never felt his path to victory ran through the rust belt: but to holding FLA, OH, NC, IO and winning CO and NV
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.