IDK dude, seems like people care because (1) he supported a policy prohibiting gay people from being public about their sexual orientation while serving, and (2) now he's being very public about his sexual orientation. Smells close enough to hypocrisy to warrant outrage. No?
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
“How can I use a negative piece from the conservative Washington Examiner about a former politician’s personal life to attack the libs?” I actually don’t know. This one’s a mystery.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And just because your gay you don’t have to vote for gay marriage or transgenders in the military...as long as your upfront if you are in office
-
*you're x 2.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hypocrisy, genius. He sells out his people for personal gain.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The issue is that he professed to diisapprove of this behavior when it benefit his political standing. And that had real consequences for other gay people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That article is shameful. It reeks of spite. What is the purpose for it other than to out and shame a private citizen? Utterly disgraceful.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because they were French kissing!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wouldn’t have published his photo. And we don’t care. However, the ppl doing it are doing so because of the utterly laughable level of hypocrisy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.