What if I advocate vigorously defending the First Amendment rights of media, and also vigorously defending the First Amendment rights of critics of media?
-
-
I particularly liked the substantive part where you attributed to me the view that if speech is legal it must be good. That was very honest and good faith.
-
Because that is the consequence of the argument you advance! Specifically, your insistence that we discuss only the legal rules as the only benchmark for right & wrong. If you disagree, say so. So far as I can tell, you are literally advocating the heckler's veto here.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
-
No, that’s more dishonest strawmanning.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dan, the only idea you ever have is how you can advance your partisan agenda.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.