There's a number of historical problems with the "Electoral College was created to protect slavery" narrative. Left-wing historian Sean Wilentz looks at one of those, specifically, how the Constitutional Convention actually voted.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/04/opinion/the-electoral-college-slavery-myth.html …
-
Show this thread
-
Worth noting as well: Madison, who raised the slavery issue at the Convention after authoring the original Virginia Plan (under which Congress elected POTUS) was later willing to compromise on popular election bc he was optimistic about growth of the southern electorate.pic.twitter.com/zIwxKq6tuN
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
A fair amount of the slavery-at-the-Constitutional-Convention stuff also relies on an ahistorical projection of the post-1830 dynamics backward onto the men of the 1780s. Neither slavery's opponents nor its defenders were as zealous at the time, nor as assured of the future.
2 replies 3 retweets 18 likesShow this thread -
The Founding generation took concrete steps against slavery & was optimistic about its long-term abolition, but there were still northern slave states in 1787 (NY, NJ), & northern opinion was still a long ways from trying to ban slavery in the South.
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likesShow this thread -
The dismal fate of Ben Franklin's anti-slavery petition to Congress in 1790 shows how far from mainstream it was, at the time, to use federal power to ban slavery in states where it existed, rather than rely on state bans & federal territorial bans. http://www.ushistory.org/documents/antislavery.htm …
1 reply 3 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
That history may seem irrelevant to what happened at Philadelphia in 1787, but it's not. The context of where elite opinion stood on slavery in 1787 informs the realistic scope of what the delegates' hopes & fears were.
2 replies 3 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Me
@NRO: What the Electoral College Saves Us From https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/04/what-the-electoral-college-saves-us-from/ …pic.twitter.com/OkR9Z5IIMl
11 replies 14 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @baseballcrank @NRO
It isn’t destabilizing to have a President elected over the objections of most Americans?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Brian_Dell @NRO
Sure. But the system is designed to legitimize minority presidents. A majority voted against Bill Clinton twice, Hillary, Gore, JFK, etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
A majority voted for Congressional representation = a majority voting against Bill Clinton twice?pic.twitter.com/XapOF9pyRt
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, literally Bill Clinton ran twice and got less than half the vote both times.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.