"It's OK if you can convince your partisans you were cheated" is an exception that swallows every possible example covered by the rule.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jneeley78 @zneeley25
Kemp won by 65,000 votes.https://www.weeklystandard.com/michael-warren/2018-midterms-whats-the-truth-about-the-53-000-pending-voters-in-georgia …
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
About 54,800.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This is *required* by federal law https://www.themaven.net/theresurgent/erick-erickson/the-facts-about-georgia-s-secretary-of-state-canceling-voter-registrations-dGWxiOUWHUmBg8fvbTQUjg/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I try hard not to do this. And I’m not necessarily challenging anything here. But I don’t trust Erik Erickson as a careful, empirically accurate journalist about anything (Yes, I know he lives in the state.) You just made a mistake, but I’d trust you. Or Josiah. But not him.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The background requirements are not reasonably disputedhttps://www.nationalreview.com/corner/supreme-courts-narrow-decision-purging-voter-rolls/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Ok, thxs. As I said, I just don’t think he’s a trustworthy source even if, coincidentally, he is sometimes accurate.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
FWIW, you're entitled to reject Erick's ideological priors, & everybody gets details wrong sometimes, but I've known him for 15 years & he knows this sort of stuff cold & has in my experience been reliable on the facts & law.
-
-
Ok, fair enough.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.