"Headlines I'd have preferred to read in 2012"https://twitter.com/PeterSullivan4/status/1112706361123586049 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Perhaps Christie..heck maybe even Jeb!
End of conversation
-
-
-
Still, the 2012 Republican primary wasn't exactly a murderers row of great candidates
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We needed some of the 2016 non-Trump roster of candidates to run in 2012. Romney's failure absolutely opened the door for Trump among a sufficient number of
@GOP primary voters. -
There were 2 main reasons Romney won in 2012. 1) Hopefully, the last occurrence of "its his turn" that got us Dole in 96, McCain in 08, then Mitt in 12. 2) He used the oppo research machine to kill his rivals with the silent partner of media.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Unfortunately, the better alternative candidate decided he would rather be President of Purdue then President of the US.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I still remember confidently stating that Romney wouldn't be the nominee because of Romneycare. Oops.
#IDontKnowAnythingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe the strategic mistake was trying to convince people of the utterly insane claim that Romneycare/Obamacare were the modern equivalent of slavery.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
History has also vindicated those who argued that expanding health care is a good thing, and popular, and refusing to do so makes you unpopular. Maybe Mitt should have stuck to his HC principles, not the tea party's.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.