This sounds stupid, but I'm inclined not to make too much of this one; it's more of a Bushism. She has the general concept that the amendment was a reaction to FDR's overlong tenure, which it was. Hazard of imprecise public speaking. Not everyone's a historian.https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1112146790860668928 …
-
-
I guess I just find it bad when people who run for and are in office can't even get basic facts right. Yes it was in reaction to FDR having 4 terms. We are better off with it. But if one is so sloppy, it's why they can get away with the big lies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.