This sounds stupid, but I'm inclined not to make too much of this one; it's more of a Bushism. She has the general concept that the amendment was a reaction to FDR's overlong tenure, which it was. Hazard of imprecise public speaking. Not everyone's a historian.https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1112146790860668928 …
-
-
Agreed. It was clearly a response to FDR. Had any other President seriously considered a 3rd term?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's her certainty in ignorance that bothers me more than anything.
-
Bullseye.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Does anyone want to tell her about her party and the Civil Rights Act?
-
Sure. A bunch if their members went to the Republican Party rather than vote for civil rights.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed, Dan. I personally would not vote for her for dog catcher, but this is reaching a bit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry but this is basic stuff. You would dump on the president if he said something like this. We need to expect some basic knowledge from these people.
-
I've dumped on Trump when he's just totally off the mark on history. I've also defended Trump when he's got the general idea but phrasing it badly.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Difference between lying and speaking incorrectly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.