You can't seriously defend the proposition that Dred Scott was a non-factor. It was certainly treated as such by the leading figures of the day. It contributed to the schism at the 1860 D Convention, fueled the growth of the R Party, & the R reaction fed Ssouthern paranoia.
"Constitutionally correct" from a law professor writing in law reviews about a court decision overwhelmingly derided by legal analysts is a legal conclusion whether or not one admits to be doing law.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.