Muskets were designed as weapons of war.https://twitter.com/JoeNBC/status/1107452120054280193 …
If you can't see why this presents a problem for Joe's argument, which is based entirely on whether a gun is designed as a weapon of war, the profession of law is probably not for you.
-
-
except Scalia specifically address military-style weaponry in the Heller decision -- mentioning M-16 by name. Luckily for us, intentionally misconstruing someone's point to its most simplistic terms, like you've done to
@JoeNBC, isn't a sound legal argument. -
You probably should have read the preceding paragraph. Judges don't like it when you cite cases that way.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.