Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
baseballcrank's profile
Dan McLaughlin
Dan McLaughlin
Dan McLaughlin
Verified account
@baseballcrank

Tweets

Dan McLaughlinVerified account

@baseballcrank

Senior Writer @NRO. Reaganite, Catholic, Mets fan, ex-lawyer. Opinions 100% my own, but you can share them. Not the Cardinals broadcaster.

New York
nationalreview.com/author/dan-mcl…
Joined May 2009

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019

      14. The subsequent rounds of expanding & contracting the Court (up to 10 in 1863, then seats eliminated so Andrew Johnson couldn't name any Justices, then back to 9 for good in 1869) were all part of the Civil War & Reconstruction, to wrest the Court away from the Dred Scott era.

      2 replies 9 retweets 42 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019

      15. Dred Scott was a calamity that convinced much of America that the democratic process had been foreclosed. The stability of the Court at 9 since 1869 has greatly rebuilt the prestige the Court lost in 1857.

      3 replies 13 retweets 59 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019

      16. Even FDR at the pinnacle of his power, having just won over 500 electoral votes and holding over 80% of the Senate, found that Court-packing was a step too far towards making the Court a flimsy tool of politicians for the American public to tolerate.

      6 replies 20 retweets 79 likes
      Show this thread
    4. Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019

      17. The Court has always been political in various ways, but life tenure, Justices long outlasting the people who appoint them - these things sustain the Court as a separate branch. Allowing them to just be swamped whenever POTUS wants new roles is banana republic stuff.

      4 replies 19 retweets 72 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019

      Dan McLaughlin Retweeted a left-leaning but high-quality polling outlet

      18. McElwee is reaching here (he can't point to any action ever taken by the R caucus) but even so, Senate obstruction can be fixed by the next Senate elections. Expanding the size of the Court is a permanent step. Not remotely comparable.https://twitter.com/SeanMcElwee/status/1107652774852993024 …

      Dan McLaughlin added,

      a left-leaning but high-quality polling outletVerified account @SeanMcElwee
      John McCain said in 2016: “I promise you that we will be united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton, if she were president, would put up.” The GOP already decided number of seats on the Court would be decided by politics, we’re just haggling over the numbers. pic.twitter.com/7B2RYTM2Jz
      8 replies 10 retweets 49 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019

      Dan McLaughlin Retweeted b-boy bouiebaisse

      19. Bouie (does the NY Times styleguide require me to call him Bamelle Jouie?) ignores the ideological nature & context of Jackson's move by assuming I'm saying it was originally all about slavery. But rather ignores that Jackson appointed Taney.https://twitter.com/jbouie/status/1107720100721950722 …

      Dan McLaughlin added,

      b-boy bouiebaisseVerified account @jbouie
      Now, mr. craseball gets one thing right: Dred Scott set the stage for the Civil War. But his facts about “court packing” are...wrong.
      Show this thread
      1 reply 6 retweets 31 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019

      Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Craig Calcaterra

      20. Craig simply ignores both the history preceding the Garland fight, including prior D filibusters (I started this thread linking to my prior writeups rather than rehash them here) & the drastic difference in permanently changing the size of the Court.https://twitter.com/craigcalcaterra/status/1107727740013346817 …

      Dan McLaughlin added,

      Craig CalcaterraVerified account @craigcalcaterra
      And no, I'm not getting into big debates about this. In fact I'm logging off and working out because I'm really super tired of arguing with people who think it's just swell that McConnell deprived a twice-elected president's nominee of a hearing.
      Show this thread
      4 replies 4 retweets 39 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019

      21. Yes, we have had power struggles of increasing drama over what the Senate minority or majority can or will do with judicial nominees. But Americans rejected in 1937 the idea that the size of SCOTUS can be a politician's plaything. If we cross that, it's deeply dangerous.

      8 replies 13 retweets 55 likes
      Show this thread
    9. Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019

      22. Now, I agree with @jbouie that the expansions of the Court in 1807 & 1837 were not as openly & solely ideological as what Democrats are proposing today, and were partly practical in nature. That's not a point in their favor!

      10 replies 5 retweets 43 likes
      Show this thread
    10. Richard Yeselson‏ @yeselson 18 Mar 2019
      Replying to @baseballcrank @jbouie

      You’re not getting this. It’s not about doing it—it’s about threatening it to move a very conservative SCOTUS to the left on some key issues. (Otherwise, say, the VRA, despite 15th amendment protection, completely disappears.) If it actually happened, red states would nullify.

      3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019
      Replying to @yeselson @jbouie

      I think precipitating a constitutional crisis in which states seriously consider nullifying SCOTUS decisions is a bad road to go down and one whose history is not encouraging.

      1:15 PM - 18 Mar 2019
      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Richard Yeselson‏ @yeselson 18 Mar 2019
          Replying to @baseballcrank @jbouie

          Again—there’s no nullification unless it’s happens. It’s MAD—it’s designed to get Ribdrts SCOTUS not to, say, go back to pre 1937 jurisprudence.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Dan McLaughlin‏Verified account @baseballcrank 18 Mar 2019
          Replying to @yeselson @jbouie

          IOW, you see the threat itself as a way to demolish judicial independence.

          2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Show replies
        1. Richard Yeselson‏ @yeselson 18 Mar 2019
          Replying to @baseballcrank @jbouie

          It’s leverage. If, say, SCOTUS is going to make Dem social transfer legislation unconstitutional. Or if it makes it unconstitutional for states to create neutral gerrymandering commissions.

          0 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info