Might the headline writer have meant 51% of discretionary spending... (or maybe that's not even the correct share and/or the reporter too is that ign'ant)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Idiotic headline. Body clarifies that they actually mean DOD exceeds non-defense disc. spending, but that: 1) Is very different from headline, 2) Is an irrelevant comparison (why not compare to ALL spending?) 3) Has been true for 95% of U.S. history, so why pick on one Prez?
-
Also non-defense discretionary spending no longer includes things that Obamacare made into mandatory spending.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We need military wake up morons
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Defense spending also is clearly a function of the federal government in our constitution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh woow I guess I,m not voting for Trump now this is big news and we must save Merica from the evil
@realDonaldTrump these assholes really think us Trump voters believe their bullshit.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It wouldn’t surprise me if 1/6th of the budget is a record low. Certainly closer to that than a record high.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
