No, Kevin didn’t really attack any of Dan’s specific points, he said that Dan was saying that JFK wasn’t a liberal by back then standards. I don’t think anyone disagrees that JFK wouldn’t be a liberal by today’s standards, but for yesterday’s,it’s all a matter of political theory
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Not gonna do that but this guy is kind of an arrogant douchebag, so based on that alone, you win. Congrats my G.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Excellent analysis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The dude muted you because he can't handle a debate with someone who has equal or superior knowledge of facts and can place them within political context. He knows much that isn't so as a great president once said. Great thread. Impressive display of historical knowledge.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The evidence shows you are wrong and use your biases in place of facts.
#TypicalConThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure does. And your argument's not looking too good...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Evidence” lol. Cherry picking a couple issues doesn’t prove anything. I’m liberal but also a gun owner. Does that make me a raging conservative? No, it means I think for myself and don’t blindly follow my party on every single issue.
-
That's his point. JFK's departure from today's orthodoxy would have him blackballed from today's Democrats.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.