Well, there's always plan B of citing Miller as precedent for restricting ownership of guns that are too militaristic when it really just allowed restricting guns that ostensibly weren't militarily useful enough.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"For over 200 years after the adoption of the Second Amendment, it was uniformly understood as not placing any limit on either federal or state authority to enact gun control legislation." - Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens
-
A statement that makes no sense what so ever
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Of course it does. Daou is trying to suggest that the word “regulated” is the Constitution giving the government unlimited authority to legislate gun ownership. It quite clearly is not.
End of conversation
-
-
-
@peterdaou is a disingenuous hack. He knows what it meant, but that doesn't fit with his narrative.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Repetition is the mother of learning. Meanings have to be repeated from time to time to be enduring. We (they) tried to un-learn us that in the 60s.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So how are current owners drilling and showing the discipline *of militia*? Instead, you’ve got every idiot in town thinking guns make them something special, and kids and people who want to kill themselves paybthe price.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yup, the local gun owners drill and discipline all the time near me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The meaning we attach to regulated would also be inconsistent with that nasty little "shall not be infringed" bit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.