Did someone say normspic.twitter.com/JLkhNTDbfi
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then let them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Him, not they, which Crank knows, so as usual he’s full bad faith here
End of conversation
-
-
-
Yes, but maybe this time they will have a more popular president and a larger majority in Congress than Democrats had in 1937 . . .
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Still kind of pales in comparison to the notorious abuses of power going on by the Republican Party right now. Just saying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The number of SCOTUS justices is not a “constitutional norm”.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Like the norm of SCOTUS Justices requiring 60 votes to confirm? Oh wait, the Democrats did that since they didn’t have enough votes to confirm Sotomayor? Republicans asked them not to but they didn’t listen. That same rule ushered two Trump nominees in.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.