1. I've long thought that the behavior of liberal media figures moderating GOP primary debates shows it's foolhardy to pick moderators so far out of step with the people doing the actual voting. It tends to elevate issues primary voters don't care about & downplay what they do.
-
-
7. If the Democrats want their debates to be moderated entirely by left-wing activists and liberal pundits, go ahead. The whole point is to let the party's voters pick somebody they want to represent them. Fairness to the opposing party is no part of that.
Show this thread -
8. The only fairness issue that matters in picking a primary moderator is having somebody who isn't on the team of one *primary* candidate over another. That was where CNN had problems with Donna Brazile. So the focus should be on honest brokers within the party.
Show this thread -
9. Now, is it irresistibly amusing to poke some fun at Democrats for wanting their primary to be a walled garden free of tough questions from the outside? Sure. It punctures some of their favorite pretensions. But at the end of the day, that's what the general election is for.
Show this thread -
10. We ought to have stronger parties that control their own message & live & die by how that message sells in November. This is a step in that direction, one I'd be happy to see Republicans imitate.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
how many outlets could really host a GOP primary debate that reflect their voters? after FOX you'd probably have to start looking at online partners to stream with
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.