@dakami I knew, but I couldn't believe someone would actually say this is a solution. Sigh. Thanks Dan. Always appreciate your comments.
-
-
Replying to @SwiftOnSecurity
@SwiftOnSecurity How can you not believe it? There are a bunch of smart people who think this is a good idea.@dakami1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @taoeffect
@SwiftOnSecurity Have you talked to someone other than@dakami about this? Perhaps like the people working in this field?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@SwiftOnSecurity What work have you done related to key-value blockchains like Namecoin?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @taoeffect
@taoeffect@SwiftOnSecurity how many decades have you been working on large scale naming1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dakami
@taoeffect@SwiftOnSecurity I don't even hate namecoin, just think non-fungibility and scale issues limit it. But maybe that's too much cred3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@SwiftOnSecurity What non-fungibility issues? Scale issues are easily solved, just like they are about to be solved for Bitcoin.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @taoeffect
@taoeffect@SwiftOnSecurity if Microsoft loses the key for Microsoft.bit, it's either gone, or a huge ransom. It's not like Bitcoin that way1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @dakami
@dakami@SwiftOnSecurity In Bitcoin if you lose your key your funds are gone. It’s the same, and it has the same solutions as Bitcoin.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@taoeffect @dakami @SwiftOnSecurity Bitcoins are fungible. Names are an intangible asset. They are not the same.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.