@fugueish "perfect forward secrecy" would have you not use related outputs from a CSPRNG, but "true randomness" or something
-
-
Replying to @bascule1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @davidleongil
@davidleongil@fugueish this is a semantic argument I don't want to have, and using "perfect" in this capacity is very misleading...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@davidleongil@fugueish I am not the only one who feels this way: several prominent cryptographers have spoken out against the term1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@davidleongil@fugueish I always use Forward Secrecy (key erasure is a better description, but too late FS sticks)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @bascule2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @davidleongil
@davidleongil @mik235 @fugueish without Erasure things will be decryptable Always: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSMeUPFjQHc …
9:18 PM - 24 Feb 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.