@fugueish "perfect forward secrecy" would have you not use related outputs from a CSPRNG, but "true randomness" or something
-
-
-
@davidleongil@fugueish this is a semantic argument I don't want to have, and using "perfect" in this capacity is very misleading... -
@davidleongil@fugueish I am not the only one who feels this way: several prominent cryptographers have spoken out against the term -
@bascule@davidleongil@fugueish I always use Forward Secrecy (key erasure is a better description, but too late FS sticks) -
@mik235@davidleongil@fugueish +1 key erasure -
-
@davidleongil@mik235@fugueish without Erasure things will be decryptable Always: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSMeUPFjQHc …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.