Offending email re: previous tweet: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.phc/2394 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@bascule "criminal" is (way) too far, but don't be too quick to dismiss - these are the type of complaints NIST would have to answer to -
@mik235 NIST still ended up picking a highly controversial, slow hash function for SHA-3. People in glass-houses... -
@bascule yes, but nobody learns anything from a rejection without rationale. I think a subjective or even speculative would be fine though -
@mik235 as I said in my response, I think we should publish all of the votes -
@bascule yes, and a write-up for each vote (like how the US Supreme Court has judgements) would also be good
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@bascule I have so stopped reading the list discussion weeks ago. /c@0xabad1deaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@bascule what?!? where?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@0xabad1dea@bascule ahahaha NIST..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@bascule jesus watThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@bascule His PHC entry didn't make the cutThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.