@BRIAN_____ @tqbf It wasn't us who proposed this "there can be only one" CFRG process.
-
-
@bascule@tqbf@BRIAN_____ http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2014q4/000358.html … My point exactly, GPG 2.1 isn't even 3 months old -
-
@tqbf@bascule http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.openssh.devel/20442 … Early 2014? It was at best very very new. NOTE: does not prove I'm not having a stroke.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.