@bascule @peregrine @rbondev @jayroh anything more to read on that other than the ghetto post?
@unbalancedparen @knewter @peregrine @rbondev @jayroh Erjang proved pretty much everything about that sort of reasoning wrong
-
-
@bascule@knewter@peregrine@rbondev@jayroh why? have you seend a real systems running erjang that proves that sort of reasoning wrong? -
@unbalancedparen@knewter@peregrine@rbondev@jayroh no, but I know lots of people who have GC problems with Erlang programs -
@bascule@knewter@peregrine@rbondev@jayroh sure! the gc is pretty simple and "slow". however the good part is that the gc of one process -
@bascule@knewter@peregrine@rbondev@jayroh won't slow down the gc of another one. in some cases it can be a feature, in most it is not -
@unbalancedparen@knewter@peregrine@rbondev@jayroh a shared heap garbage collector can have similar soft realtime characteristics... -
@unbalancedparen@knewter@peregrine@rbondev@jayroh ...while also reducing the total amount of allocations/garbage... -
@unbalancedparen@knewter@peregrine@rbondev@jayroh BEAM tried this and failed with the shared/hybrid heap experiments
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@unbalancedparen@knewter@peregrine@rbondev@jayroh Azul was scaling to thousands of cores in the early '00s. BEAM still can'tThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.