@whitequark @bascule ..and don't be fooled by people trying to tell you DNSSEC will solve this. :)
-
-
Replying to @a_z_e_t
@a_z_e_t@whitequark I kind of like DNSSEC in a sort of "lesser of all evils" way :|2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@a_z_e_t@whitequark DNSSEC is much worse than the evils we have now.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tqbf
@tqbf@bascule@whitequark yes. thanks for helping out here ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @a_z_e_t
@a_z_e_t@bascule@whitequark I feel like I wrote an 8,000 word blog post about this. Oh, wait: I did, and just never hit “Publish”. :P3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tqbf
@tqbf@bascule@whitequark that would at least make it more efficient for me to tell DNSSEC idolizers to fuck off, so please do!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @a_z_e_t
@a_z_e_t@tqbf@whitequark I don't actually like DNSSEC but it feels right architecturally and getting traction on something new is hard1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@tqbf@whitequark TACK felt right. and got ignored. building upon WoT/CA bullshit still doesn't I agree. new protocols please!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @a_z_e_t
@a_z_e_t@tqbf@whitequark most of what@trevp__ does gets ignored despite the fact he's one of the world's most brilliant cryptographers3 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@tqbf@whitequark i'm very happy axolotl sees far reaching deployment!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@a_z_e_t @tqbf @whitequark strongly agree!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.