@bascule yeah you're right. I'm not making sense
@a_z_e_t there are real arguments against DNSSEC like: 702 "friendly", no confidentiality, shitty keysizes (1024-bit RSA)
-
-
.
@a_z_e_t the real problem with DNSSEC from an authority perspective is it gives government owners total authority over their namespaces -
-
-
-
-
-
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@bascule yes but everyone brings them up. i do have a deeper problem with the proposal and always had. also: almost no deployment/commitment -
@a_z_e_t DNSSEC is at least widely deployed among email providers. Some are using DANE for STARTTlS authentication -
@bascule i'm just not going to bet on a protocol that by the time DANE sees wide deployment is going to be completely obsolete anyhow.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.