Say, @bascule - do I remember that you're bullish on langsec? What about langsec+JSON?
-
-
Replying to @judsonlester
@judsonlester yes. JSON is context-free and should be fine AFAIK /cc@sergeybratus@maradydd1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@sergeybratus@maradydd Here's the question I have: JSON parsing rules are silent about repeated keys. Admits birthday for MAuth?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @judsonlester
@bascule@sergeybratus@maradydd I.e. if application uses the conventional "last key wins", infinite docs with same meaning.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @judsonlester
@judsonlester@sergeybratus@maradydd JSON keys should probably be represented as a list, and not as a hash. Latter enables hashDoS2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@sergeybratus@maradydd Agreed, but a) spec is silent on field-name semantics and b) I know of no impl that does treat them as list2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@judsonlester @sergeybratus @maradydd Erlang did it! :o
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.