.@matthew_d_green seems like @CloudFlare Universal SSL could benefit from some form of proxy reencryption, no?
-
-
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@matthew_d_green Way too slow still, no? Cycle counts?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidleongil
@davidleongil@matthew_d_green encryption is rarely the bottleneck, especially with e.g. AES-NI1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@matthew_d_green Yes, of course: even AES-GCM ~ 1 cpb. But how many kilocycles to do proxy re-encryption part?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidleongil
@davidleongil@matthew_d_green what if it’s just double AES encryption?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule That's not "proxy re-encryption", just double encryption. See, e.g.,@matthew_d_green's classic at http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/4732 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@davidleongil I have seen that, why do you think I directed my question at @matthew_d_green in the first place? :P
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.