@taoeffect @ralphholz @ioerror @sleevi_ @fugueish guess we’re just talking past each other
-
-
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish “verifiers" = auditors? They don’t see the MITM, nor must they be honest. -
@taoeffect@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish I’m out of gas on this discussion. Have a nice rest of your evening -
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_ Enjoy yours as well! -
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_ PoC posted: The Trouble with Certificate Transparency: http://blog.okturtles.com/2014/09/the-trouble-with-certificate-transparency/ … -
@taoeffect@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_ that is, at least, a better presentation of your argument than I've seen before ;) -
@bascule@taoeffect@ralphholz@ioerror Yes, a better presentation of an bad argument that completely ignores Section 5 of RFC 6962. :) -
@sleevi_@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror Be specific, what does it ignore? -
@sleevi_@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror (I reviewed that entire section.) - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.