@taoeffect @ralphholz @ioerror @sleevi_ @fugueish Let’s start with your claim that CT is vulnerable to MitM attacks
-
-
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish The claim has been substantiated multiple times at this point. You are now wasting my time. -
@taoeffect@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish claiming the claim is substantiated is still a claim. PoC||GTFO -
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish “verifiers" = auditors? They don’t see the MITM, nor must they be honest. -
@taoeffect@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish I’m out of gas on this discussion. Have a nice rest of your evening -
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_ Enjoy yours as well! -
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_ PoC posted: The Trouble with Certificate Transparency: http://blog.okturtles.com/2014/09/the-trouble-with-certificate-transparency/ … -
@taoeffect@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_ that is, at least, a better presentation of your argument than I've seen before ;) - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.