.@ralphholz @ioerror @sleevi_ @fugueish CT auditing can still miss NSA-style MITM:https://twitter.com/taoeffect/status/505109704800878592 …
@taoeffect @ralphholz @ioerror @sleevi_ @fugueish Let’s start with your claim that CT is vulnerable to MitM attacks
-
-
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish Yes, what part of it? Do you need an explanation of what a MitM attack is, or what? -
@taoeffect@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish guess we’re just talking past each other -
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish Still waiting for you to back up your claim that I’m making unsubstantiated claims… -
@taoeffect@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish that would be called shifting the burden of proof -
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish Unlike you, I substantiated my claims, so burden of proof is on you to refute them. -
@taoeffect@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish try starting with “A MitM attack on CT” and don’t mention DNSChain, Namecoin, or OKTurtles -
@bascule@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish Yes, that was done in the links you were given: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/current/msg00233.html … -
@taoeffect@ralphholz@ioerror@sleevi_@fugueish based on that, I don’t think you understand how verifiable maps work - 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.