@bascule @4Dgifts @matthew_d_green @bleidl Are you sure about that? Or do you just not like ASN.1?
-
-
Replying to @tqbf
@tqbf@4Dgifts@matthew_d_green@bleidl tying authentication to the naming system is the right architectural decision, at least…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@tqbf@4Dgifts@matthew_d_green S/MIME + DANE means you trust your email provider to behave honestly, right?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bleidl
@bleidl@tqbf@4Dgifts@matthew_d_green yes, you have to trust your mail provider/“gateway”. But Google can already read my GMail…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @matthew_d_green
@matthew_d_green@bleidl@tqbf@4Dgifts sure, your ISP can give out fake keys and MitM you in this model. Got a better solution?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @matthew_d_green
@matthew_d_green@bleidl@tqbf@4Dgifts if a provider screws you or others over, you can change providers/gateways in a federated system1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @matthew_d_green
@matthew_d_green@bleidl@tqbf@4Dgifts I guess I should mention my own opinions on the best solution fluctuate daily ;)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@bleidl @tqbf @4Dgifts generally agree with @matthew_d_green that PGP needs replacing. But I still see the use of improving PGP status quo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.