@bascule @seancribbs have you read the raft paper? It reads like TCP/PGM never happened.
-
-
Replying to @Asmod4n2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @seancribbs
@seancribbs raft assumes packets don’t arrive in the same order they were send from the remote peer, which doesn’t happen with tcp or pgm.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seancribbs
@Asmod4n But that still doesn't guarantee *consensus* or agreement. That's a higher-level semantic than simple delivery.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seancribbs
@seancribbs what i read out of the raft paper is that time travel happens.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seancribbs
@seancribbs not loss, you send 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and get 1, 2, 5, 3, 4. tcp makes sure that cannot happen.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Asmod4n
@seancribbs Message loss is normal, what i just don’t get is why they try to reinvent tcp or assume everyone who wants to implement raft2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Asmod4n
@seancribbs Or are they working around network partitions where the leader doesn’t notice he just lost all followers?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@Asmod4n @seancribbs yeah, I think you're assuming the network is reliable ;)
-
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.