Some good points here MT @hubert3: MT @bascule Great description of why keybase.io is [...]conceptually flawed: http://blog.lrdesign.com/2014/03/thoughts-on-keybase-io/ …
@USSJoin @DarthNull @hubert3 trying to solve the usability problem is great (and my day job), but Keybase totally punts on security...
-
-
@bascule@DarthNull@hubert3 If your argument is "it can be done better," then good: go do it. But good > nothing, which is what we have. -
@USSJoin@DarthNull@hubert3 having a rock that keeps tigers away is better than no rock at all? -
@bascule@DarthNull@hubert3 Do it better yourself, then. The UX is the whole tool for the masses; bad UX == tool doesn't exist. At all. -
@USSJoin@DarthNull@hubert3 working on it. FWIW, there's also Cryptocat which is in a better state -
@bascule@DarthNull@hubert3 CryptoCat isn't for asynchronous messaging. Shockingly, people need both.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@bascule@DarthNull@hubert3 it doesn't rely on humans to verify fingerprints. It doesn't punt on security---just key signing parties. -
@USSJoin@DarthNull@hubert3 they even admit they punt on security o_O
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.