@kenkeiter @mattetti As always, use science when unsure. :)
-
-
Replying to @evanphx2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @kenkeiter
@kenkeiter@evanphx@mattetti does that make Go's structural type system seem like a good idea?#trolol2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@kenkeiter@mattetti Structural typing seems like a good idea stone cold sober.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @evanphx
@evanphx@kenkeiter@mattetti all the pain of a type system with none of the features or benefits?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@kenkeiter@mattetti But feel to troll away troller!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @evanphx
@evanphx@kenkeiter@mattetti Hindley-Milner or GTFO ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@kenkeiter@mattetti You writing a lot of Haskell or OCaml these days?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@kenkeiter@mattetti It does Hindley-Milner? If so, people sure to love writing type sigs.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@evanphx @kenkeiter @mattetti otherwise known as "shit rustc says". Yeah it does H-M, no higher kinded types/subtypes yet
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.