@postmodern_mod3 @wmeissner @hiro_asari because people are telling me they literally can't use my software because of FFI's license :P
-
-
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@wmeissner@hiro_asari they probably confusing LGPL with GPL/AGPL, or are afraid of getting Stallman cooties.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @postmodern_mod3
@postmodern_mod3@wmeissner@hiro_asari this is not the case, I can assure you1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@wmeissner@hiro_asari how can you assure me? *GPL does not put restrictions on usage, only re-distribution.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @postmodern_mod3
@postmodern_mod3@wmeissner@hiro_asari answered OOB4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@hiro_asari basically, it's the legal departments choice to block LGPL, and not@wmeissner's responsibility to re-license for them.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @postmodern_mod3
@postmodern_mod3@hiro_asari@wmeissner IMO it makes no sense for FFI to have a different license from Ruby2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@hiro_asari or FFI could dual license, and offer a commercial license. That way@wmeissner would be compensated.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @postmodern_mod3
@postmodern_mod3@hiro_asari@wmeissner or I could switch back to Cexts for my libs. I'm sure@headius@evanphx@brixen would love that1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@hiro_asari@wmeissner note that$MEGA_CORP will benefit more from using your code, more than you will. Don't bend over backwards.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@postmodern_mod3 @hiro_asari @wmeissner I'm not actually going to abandon FFI :P but this does make me emo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.