@puffnfresh @dysinger @shit_so_says @raganwald I think programming in a pute functional manner has much higher cognitive overhead...
-
-
Replying to @bascule
Brian McKenna Retweeted Brian McKenna
@bascule@dysinger@shit_so_says@raganwald not-functions are demonstrate-ably harder to reason about. Cognitive:https://twitter.com/puffnfresh/status/318750955996839936 …Brian McKenna added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@dysinger@shit_so_says@raganwald I hear this line, and yet FP has failed to see mainstream adoption. Why?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@dysinger@shit_so_says@raganwald it has seen mainstream adoption, but in any case, you think popularity implies worth?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @puffnfresh
@puffnfresh@dysinger@shit_so_says@raganwald popularity means people are capable of learning it and applying it in the real world4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@puffnfresh You can use the same argument against GPG. Does it mean GPG is wrong? I don't think so.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_mlen
@_mlen@puffnfresh yes, yes it does. http://www.gaudior.net/alma/johnny.pdf1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_mlen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.