@evanphx what do you think about having an SSL-implementation independent class for X.509 certificates? /cc @seancribbs @halorgium
-
-
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@seancribbs@halorgium I'm in favor of it. X509 was never designed for SSL (thus the weird extensions and CN usage).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @evanphx
@evanphx@seancribbs@halorgium perhaps it's something Krypt could provide /cc@_emboss_1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@seancribbs@halorgium@_emboss_ The problem will always be updating clients to use a new scheme.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @evanphx
@evanphx @seancribbs @halorgium @_emboss_ or rather, isn't directly tied to OpenSSL
11:23 AM - 24 Sep 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.