@tpitale @kntreadway I’ve yet to, personally, work w/ a front-end dev that couldn’t grok it (a few even prefer it), it’s just CSS selectors
-
-
Replying to @jaw6
@jaw6@kntreadway combine that with the abstracting-away of the use of div tags, and you end up with some of the worst markup I’ve seen.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tpitale
@tpitale@jaw6@kntreadway too many devs think HAML is cleaner, but most of the HAML I see generates the worst HTML. Not HAML’s fault tho2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @boboroshi
@boboroshi@jaw6@kntreadway when you make divs for every .classname, I think it is HAML's fault. Over-abstraction. :-)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tpitale
@tpitale@jaw6@kntreadway well, you should never write HAML without an HTML tag in front of it. But yes, I rage against HAML b/c devs suck1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @boboroshi
@boboroshi@jaw6@kntreadway true. Anybody can swing a blunt object really fast, re:@glv’s blog post of old.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tpitale
@tpitale@boboroshi@kntreadway twitter is really not the best place to have this discussion. if haml doesn’t work for you, don’t use it…1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaw63 replies 1 retweet 1 like
-
Replying to @bscofield
@bscofield@jaw6@tpitale@boboroshi@kntreadway there's also the part where Haml blows your method caches every time you render a template1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@jaw6 yup, see: https://github.com/haml/haml/pull/615 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.