@matthew_d_green @0xabad1dea @bascule I'll be really interested to hear if NIST specifies SHA-3 as a replacement for HMAC.
@marshray @matthew_d_green @elwoz according to the Keccak paper, NIST SP 800-108 is the only standard that relies explicitly on HMAC
-
-
@bascule@matthew_d_green@elwoz http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips198-1/FIPS-198-1_final.pdf … What about FIPS 198-1 (HMAC) itself? -
@marshray@matthew_d_green@elwoz remains to be seen I guess... but obsolete? ;) -
@bascule@matthew_d_green@elwoz Looking at slide 41/60 again it seems the "padded message" length wouldn't include the key.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.