@bascule I don't think ruby's semantics make sense without eval open.
-
-
-
@KirinDave it'd sure suck for Rails! LOL -
@bascule Name a non-trivial ruby application it wouldn't really hurt. -
@KirinDave one written from the ground up around this idea ;) -
@bascule At some point you need to put down ruby and find a more suitable tool if you seriously consider that route. -
@KirinDave I'm not sure what other language I could write a system like Celluloid in besides Python. I've seen the result in Scala and o_O -
@bascule What does that have to do with dynamic class loading? -
@KirinDave well, about the only language I can think that's more suitable for this is... E - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@bascule what could be wrong with ill-defined semantics which require checks littered through klocs of C code? WHAT COULD GO WRONG? -
-
-
New conversation -
-
-
-
@freerobby well for one thing, it's really confusing, and confusion and security are a bad mix -
@bascule Agreed; just wasn't sure if there were deeper than that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@bascule@lucapette def eval;nil;end Probably not that simple ;)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@bascule I just wish PL geeks wouldn't implement eval functionsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.