I guess before I even bother opining on the WebCrypto situation, I should probably have a good idea of how Ruby can do better too...
@_emboss_ @namelessjon Krypt is definitely the closest analogue to WebCrypto for Ruby. Please to be keeping it up! :D
-
-
@bascule@namelessjon Although I want to walk the thin line of offering both low-level stuff (like OpenSSL) and high-level (like Keyczar). -
@_emboss_@namelessjon if only WebCrypto could do that :| -
@bascule@namelessjon It seems they value being able to deal with legacy over simplicity. Acceptable, but I had hoped for simplicity, too. -
@_emboss_@namelessjon W3C has washed their hands of normative advice about algorithms /cc@matthew_d_green -
@bascule@_emboss_@namelessjon Wait, you're saying they made a change? Or that's your description of their whole problem. -
@matthew_d_green@_emboss_@namelessjon nope, no change, but the only offer (bad) non-normative algorithm advice
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.