@bascule Added a couple higher numbers, it starts breaking down around 500,000. Am I misreading? https://gist.github.com/4443618 @CooperPress
-
-
Replying to @joefiorini
@joefiorini@CooperPress looks about an order of magnitude slower? Also keep in mind a microbenchmark of this problem is deceiving1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @joefiorini
@joefiorini it's just normalizing everything on a per-second scale. Faster is better!
10:47 AM - 3 Jan 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.