@sstephenson it's not up to an implementation to support or not support an installer. The reverse is true.
-
-
Replying to @brixen
@brixen@sstephenson could that relationship be reversed? Could impls ship their own "recipes"?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bascule
@bascule@sstephenson I have repeatedly asked RVM to just coordinate what Rubinius provides. That is how the tool should be written.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brixen
@brixen@sstephenson doesn't seem like that approach is working very well ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brixen
@brixen @sstephenson if the impl-specifics were abstracted away, installers wouldn't have any choice but to do it your way
6:58 PM - 11 Dec 2012
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.